DBQ Sourcing (AP World Edition!)

06.26.25 08:24 PM - By Claire Baumgartner

Sourcing is one of the most misunderstood of all the points on the Document Based Question.  And for good reason!  This is a complex task.  Today, we're going to tackle common misconceptions about how to earn this point.


I'm a licensed teacher and professional tutor with over ten years of experience in education.  I've helped dozens of students improve their grades in their AP class.  Read on for tips you can use to improve your grades today!

Myths and Misconceptions  

Myth 1: You must use all four types of sourcing for each document you source.

For each of the documents you chose, you should select ONE of the four options (historical situation, intended audience, purpose, or point of view).  Trying to do all four is overkill.  You earn a point when you source two documents, not when you use two different kinds of sourcing.  If you see more than one option, I generally recommend picking the one that you are more confident about explaining.  Usually one of them pops out, but you can also choose one arbitrary option.  

Myth 2: You must use all four types of sourcing in your essay.

The College Board gives you four options for sourcing: historical situation, intended audience, purpose, and point of view.  The rubric does NOT say that you must use all four.  It only says that you must use some combination of these four.


This is also true for the complexity point.  One way you can earn this point is by successfully sourcing four of the seven historical documents.  That does NOT mean you need to use all four of types once.  Just like with the standard sourcing point, you can use all of them, one of them, or anything between those extremes.


Let's say I have an essay where I will use four documents.  My plan for sourcing could look like this:


Document 1: Purpose

Document 2: None

Document 3: None

Document 4: Intended Audience


This is an acceptable plan even though I won't use historical situation or point of view.  

Myth 3: You have to source all of the documents you use.

Nope!  You must source two of the documents to earn the sourcing point.  Most people use more than two documents in their DBQ.  You have to if you wish to earn both evidence points.  The one exception is if you use four documents AND you plan to source all four of them for the complexity point.  Then, you would need to source all of your documents.

Otherwise, this is perfectly fine plan for sourcing even though Document 2 and 3 won't be sourced.


Document 1: Purpose

Document 2: None

Document 3: None

Document 4: Intended Audience


Do NOT leave documents out of your essay just because you don't know how to source them.  If you've got a document that supports your thesis, it belongs in your essay.

You may choose to source more documents than you need to.  Some people like to do this to give themselves a backup in case the graders reject one of their other sourcing attempts.  This is fine.  However, don't get too carried away.  Remember that your goal is always to earn the next point that you can.  So you should only be doing extra sourcing if it won't cost you another point.  Sourcing can be time consuming, so be strategic about whether that time is best spent here or elsewhere.  

Myth 4: You can't repeat the type of sourcing you use in one essay.  If you do, it looks bad.

Good news.  This is also false.  It is 100 percent okay to use the same type of sourcing for every document that you source in your essay.


In this situation, my sourcing plan might look like this:


Document 1: Historical Situation

Document 2: Historical Situation

Document 3: None

Document 4: None


A variant on this myth is: "Okay, but it's bad to repeat.  More variety is more complex."


That's true in the bigger picture.  But analyzing a source in an inherently complex form of thinking, and that doesn't change depending on how it's packaged.  In the context of the exam, the College Board has outline specific ways to earn the complexity point.  You can earn this point by successfully sourcing four documents.  The guidelines don't say anything about variety, which means how you do that is up to you.  

Myth 5: Some of the sourcing options are better or easier than others.

I've changed my thinking on this.  I used to advise students to think about purpose and intended audience.  Then I worked with a lot more students.  At this point, I think two things are true.


  • Some students find it easier to analyze specific aspects of a source.
  • Some sources are easier to analyze from a specific source.

A better strategy is simply to be aware of your own strengths and weaknesses.  Whenever possible, you want to play to those strengths.  If you usually earn the point when you use intended audience, then you should look for documents where you see a connection to the intended audience.  Similarly, you can look for patterns in documents.  I often have an easier time analyzing intended audience for documents like personal letters and speeches.  It's easier to identify who the audience is and how that shows up in the speaker's work.

Again, I think this is a place where your mileage may vary.  Practice all the options, and then use the ones that work best for you on exam day.  Remember, it absolutely does not matter if you use the same one more than once.

Join the mailing list!  All the tips that are fit to mail!


You may also like these articles for AP World History students:

All blog posts are licensed using a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license.  You are free to copy or share this information in any form.  You may also adapt and build upon this material for commercial and noncommercial.  If you chose to share, adapt, or use this information, you must give credit to Spring Learning Services, LLC and indicate if changes were made.  All material must be shared using the same terms

This material is based on my interpretation of the AP World History Course and Exam Description and my experience working in education for the past decade.  The views expressed on this page are my own.  AP® and Advanced Placement® are trademarks registered and owned by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this site.